 | Zjah Lenovo to offer new ThinkPad line for small businesses
In light of recent leaks about NSArsquo PRISM, it seems dubious that government domestic surveillance could still be labeled as going dark. Nevertheless, FBI Director Robert Mueller testified <pdf> last week that the FBI is still going dark. Mueller told the Senate Judiciary Committee, The rapid pace of advances in mobile and other communication technolo <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.com.de>stanley de</a> gies continues to present a significant challenge for conducting court-approved electronic surveillance of criminals and terrorists. hellip; Because of this gap, law enforcement is increasingly unable to gain timely access to the information to which it is lawfully authorized and that it needs to protect public safety, bring criminals to justice and keep America safe.Note that he didnrsquo;t say the feds donrsquo;t have the capabil <a href=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.us>stanley cup</a> ities for surveillance, only that There is a growing gap between law enforcementrsquo legal authority to conduct electronic surveillance, and its ability to conduct such surveillance. Mark Jaycox, a policy analyst at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said that the FBI needs to provide better reasons and more information about why they need this, when technologists and academics across <a href=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.us>stanley us</a> the board are consistently saying and have shown hellip; the whole lsquo;going darkrsquo; messaging is incorrect in the golden age of surveillance.Speaking of the EFF . . . You surely appreciate the EFF that fights for your digital and p Ibsg IT Forum: Microsoft reveals Server 2008 pricing, Hyper-V brand
North Dakota bill awaits governor <a href=https://www.polenefr.fr>polene</a> s signature North Dakota is set to ban the forced implantation of radio frequency technology RFID chips into people.Both chambers of the legislature earlier this month handily passed a bill <a href=https://www.stanley-uk.uk>stanley cup uk</a> PDF format that would make it a Class A misdemeanor to force someone to have an RFID device implanted into his body. Penalties for violating the law have not yet been established. The bill was signed by North Dakota Speaker of the HouseJeff Delzeron Monday and requires only Gov.John Hoevenrsquo signature to become law.A spokesman for Hoeven said Wednesday that his office had not yet received the bill, but he anticipated it would be signed. If so, North Dakota would follow in the footsteps of Wisconsin, whichpassedsimilar legislation last year. Advocates of curbs on forced chip implantation claim it protects the civil and privacy rights of individuals. On the other hand, some RFID supporters say forced chipping could be useful for a variety of purposes, such as helping prisons to keep track of inmates or parents to monitor the whereabouts of children. It also could be used for medical purpos <a href=https://www.stanley-canada.ca>stanley canada</a> es mdash; for instance, for keeping track of patients who might be suffering from dementia or Alzheimerrsquo disease. Such patients would not be capable of giving their consent for the implantation.The legislators of North Dakota arenrsquo;t buying those arguments, however. Technology is a wonderful thing, said North Dakota state Sen.Dick D |
