 | Itxh Officer and suspect killed, two other officers hospitalized in Missouri shooting
Washington ndash; Federal prosecutors have filed a redacted version of the underlying evidence that prompted the Aug. 8 search of former president Donald Trump s Florida residence, court records showed Thursday. The sealed submission is now before a magistrate judge who will consider whether to take the unusual step of releasing portions of the secret affidavit to the public.Justice Department spokesman Anthony Coley issued a statement acknowledging the redacted version had been submitted to the court. The United States has filed a submission under seal per the Court s order of Aug. 22, he said. The Justice Department respectfully declines further comment as the Court consider <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley cup</a> s the matter. The affidavit likely contains more information about government investigators concerns regarding the documents allegedly held at Mar-a-Lago. Last week, Judge Bruce Reinhart ordered the Justice Department to provide him with proposed redactions to the affidavit ndash; which likely includes witnes <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.fr>stanley cup</a> s statements and specific allegations ndash; after media outlets including CBS News pushed for its public release. <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.fr>stanley cup</a> The Justice Department has opposed the affidavit s release, citing the need to protect the integrity of an ongoing law enforcement investigation that implicates national security. Investigative methods and the identities of FBI agents and witnesses are at stake, prosecutors told the judge, and releasing the affidavit risks chilling future c Grlz In 1983, children in California found a victim s skull with a distinctive gold tooth. She has finally been identified.
SEATTLE -- The U.S. Forest Service is proposing permanent new rules that would require media organizations to obtain a permit to film and shoot photographs in more than 100 million acres of the nation s wilderness.Under the plan, the Forest Service would consider the nature of a proposed project before approving a special use permit then charge fees of up to $1,500 for commercial filming and photography in federally designated wilderness areas.Mickey H. Osterreicher, general counsel for the National Press Photographers Association, said such rules would be a clear violation of the First Amendment and raises concerns about press freedom, including whether denying a permit would amount to prior restraint. <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.ca>stanley cup</a> What if they deny you a permit because they don t like the story you re working on he asked.Liz Close, the Forest Service s acting w <a href=https://www.adidascampus.us>adidas campus</a> ilderness director, said the Wilderness Act of 1964 prohibits commercial enterprise in <a href=https://www.reebokclassic.com.de>reebok</a> wilderness. The rules exclude breaking news situations, defined as an event or incident that arises suddenly, evolves quickly, and rapidly ceases to be newsworthy. But Osterreicher said the agency ignores big distinctions between editorial and commercial use and also should not be allowed to define what constitutes breaking news. We re headed down a really slippery slope if we allowed the government to include editorial and news gathering activities in commercial use, he said.Close said the current rules have be |
